On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> schrieb am 13.11.2013 um 02:24 in > Nachricht <90CA8980100EF12CE4C38252@[192.168.1.93]>: > > --On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 6:03 PM -0600 Alex Moen <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Any advice on this? What would the proper way to fix it be? > > > > Add a structural objectClass to the entry. All objects are required to > > have a basic structural objectClass. > > Sure? slapadd needs it, but ldapadd refuses to accept a structural > objectclass specification in my experience.
The original poster was trying to add this LDIF: dn: uid=maxUid,ou=ndtcadministration,o=ndtc objectClass: top objectClass: extensibleObject uidNumber: 55083 'top' is an abstract object class, while extensibleObject is an auxiliary object class, so none of that entry's object classes are structural object classes. Philip Guenther
