>>> Philip Guenther <[email protected]> schrieb am 13.11.2013 um >>> 09:25 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> >>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> schrieb am 13.11.2013 um 02:24 in >> Nachricht <90CA8980100EF12CE4C38252@[192.168.1.93]>: >> > --On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 6:03 PM -0600 Alex Moen <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Any advice on this? What would the proper way to fix it be? >> > >> > Add a structural objectClass to the entry. All objects are required to >> > have a basic structural objectClass. >> >> Sure? slapadd needs it, but ldapadd refuses to accept a structural >> objectclass specification in my experience. > > The original poster was trying to add this LDIF: > > dn: uid=maxUid,ou=ndtcadministration,o=ndtc > objectClass: top > objectClass: extensibleObject > uidNumber: 55083 > > 'top' is an abstract object class, while extensibleObject is an auxiliary > object class, so none of that entry's object classes are structural object > classes.
Ah! You ment the value, not the tag; I thought you were talking about the tag... > > > Philip Guenther
