Søren Holm wrote: > Why is compaction an unwanted feature ? It is misguided. It is a feature to save space, but a continually used DB will consume free space anyway.
If the DB is not going to be in continual use, then LMDB already provides offline compaction, so nothing more is needed. > > Den 03.05.2022 kl. 16.15 skrev Howard Chu: >> Søren Holm wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I know that LMDB currently does not support compaction, but I'm interested >>> in knowing if such a feature is being worked on. >> >> No. >> >>> And if not, is it a feature that can >>> be merged into LMDB if implemented? >> >> No. But feel free to fork the code and add it to your fork. >>> >>> /Søren Holm >>> >> >> > -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
