ok - thanks.
Den 03.05.2022 kl. 17.47 skrev Howard Chu:
Søren Holm wrote:
Why is compaction an unwanted feature ?
It is misguided. It is a feature to save space, but a continually used DB will
consume
free space anyway.
If the DB is not going to be in continual use, then LMDB already provides
offline compaction, so nothing more is needed.
Den 03.05.2022 kl. 16.15 skrev Howard Chu:
Søren Holm wrote:
Hi
I know that LMDB currently does not support compaction, but I'm interested in
knowing if such a feature is being worked on.
No.
And if not, is it a feature that can
be merged into LMDB if implemented?
No. But feel free to fork the code and add it to your fork.
/Søren Holm
