2 is the better solution. 4 is impossible for me as VLC is not in the main packaging repositories.
On 22 December 2015 at 21:03, Tomas Groth <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > As a new release is coming up a lot sooner that originally expected, it > also means that we need to make a decision regarding how we handle our VLC > integration. > > Currently we tell users to install VLC manually and this causes problems > on Windows and Mac OS X, where users have trouble installing the correct > version (32-bit on Windows and 64-bit on Mac). This is a real problem for > many of our users! > So to handle this there's a few things we can do: > > 1. Keep things as they are. > 2. Add a text in the "Player" configuration tab that tells the users that > they need XX-bit version of VLC to get it detected > 3. Do as above, but do real detection of VLC lib to see if the wrong bit > version of VLC is installed. > 4. Bundle VLC with OpenLP > 5. ?? > > Personally I would prefer 2 (IMHO the simplest for us) or 4 (most user > friendly). > Let me know what you think! > > Best regards, > Tomas > _______________________________________________ > openlp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev > -- Tim and Alison Bentley [email protected]
_______________________________________________ openlp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev
