Don't worry. Arch packagers are always up to the magic ;-)

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Raoul Snyman <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 28/12/2015 10:33, Tomas Groth wrote:
>
>> Therefore I propose that we postpone any effort to move to QtWebEngine
>> for now. While being stuck on QtWebkit isn't a great option either,
>> for now it seems to be the only option we have...
>>
>
> Thanks for your thorough research, Tomas. I agree that we're going to have
> to postpone the move to QtWebEngine.
>
> Fortunately, neither the up-coming Fedora, nor the up-coming Ubuntu
> releases will have Qt 5.6, so we're safe for now. I think the only platform
> that will have a problem will be Arch, because of their aggressive upgrade
> cycle, but there's nothing we can do about that (except for some sort of
> packaging magic?).
>
> --
> Raoul Snyman
> e: [email protected]
> Please note that my e-mail address has changed!
>
> _______________________________________________
> openlp-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev
>



-- 
 _  _           _     ___         _
 )\/,) ___  __  )L,   ))  __  __  )) __ _ _
((`(( ((_( (|  ((\   ((__((_)((_)(( (('((\(
_______________________________________________
openlp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev

Reply via email to