-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 12/29/2015 03:52 PM, Raoul Snyman wrote: > On 28/12/2015 10:33, Tomas Groth wrote: >> Therefore I propose that we postpone any effort to move to >> QtWebEngine for now. While being stuck on QtWebkit isn't a great >> option either, for now it seems to be the only option we have... > > Thanks for your thorough research, Tomas. I agree that we're going > to have to postpone the move to QtWebEngine. > > Fortunately, neither the up-coming Fedora, nor the up-coming > Ubuntu releases will have Qt 5.6, so we're safe for now. I think > the only platform that will have a problem will be Arch, because of > their aggressive upgrade cycle, but there's nothing we can do about > that (except for some sort of packaging magic?). >
I'm the current packager for arch. I don't think arch will move to qt5.6 until at least kde update their stuff. However I don't know what their plan is. I'll go ask the maintainer of qt about upgrade plans. I don't think I'm capable of packaging magic yet... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWgsNXAAoJENJkb4Sw+v4XNzIIAKEnh6Rlh4Dc39RhUZq12nTL +QBFxlwU6WAh1MAl5EQGP4vKhGdSWTDYUHMjDNy4ApA9frLaPsvXmZaFhH4rZBaB bvhI6Fpav9xEfND7g7mz9nigloFq1Ex3SNa1beWvm+1uyjuyTDjf3Wi1S6J4lBs3 SMEAg0pBsTlQqm+jRg9DAqZ9u0vkPlJw4h2E0BOtoh9LfY5cD79iQb+haA8YuI9u wPigiWfg8YqS4jUS6Yq68GnQbvahJyR+uXH/g4K/SM7MFpgDshZDV6VJ34WG0bbv s7Mjhq1fchRR6Y9RFbbO1zkx8nGbE5r41hlpg5wtFTlTHETlsrDr6OrbzEfxzdo= =wdBq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ openlp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev
