me too 2) and 4) at a later stage.

Sebastian

2011/8/31 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>

> I would vote for 2) + 4)
>
>
> 2011/8/31 [email protected] <[email protected]>
>
> The question remains if we want to be able to run and deploy the code in
>> eclipse or not.
>>
>> You could integrate OpenLaszlo again into the Eclipse Webapps dir. That
>> way you could integrate OpenLaszlo in Eclipse and run it. This enables to be
>> able to compile the client with a simple "F5"/refresh in the browser.
>>
>> However not sure we should really do that. We could also add a sth to the
>> build-properties in Eclipse to use an  ANT script.
>> But then we might better use a usual/pure Java-Project template in Eclipse
>> and not the current Java WebApplication template that indicates that you
>> might be able to deploy the code inside Eclipse.
>>
>> For Red5, in case somebody wants to debug the code, they shall use the
>> Remote Console of Eclipse and connect the JVM to the code. I have no
>> intention to redo all those steps and copy hundreds of .class files around
>> every time a new Red5 version comes up. We will just use red5 compiled as
>> dist/jar and place it just like now.
>>
>> If that is done, generating some new screens and docs is only a marginal
>> issue to solve. The main thing is to agree on how we will proceed with the
>> sources in the future.
>>
>> So what shall we do?
>> 1) Integrate OpenLaszlo into Eclipse + ANT Script to compile
>> 2) ANT Only and transform the Eclispe project into usual Java Project (we
>> can rename then the project also to be NOT named ROOT)
>> 3) Do the hole cycle with Red5 AND OpenLaszlo again to be able to run Red5
>> AND OpenLaszlo both in Eclipse? (This requires the hole project to be called
>> ROOT in Eclipse cause of Red5 glitches)
>> ------
>> Gimmick points:
>> 4) Add an ANT task that compiles a .war version of OpenMeetings
>>
>> Opinions? Alternatives?
>>
>> Sebastian
>>
>>
>> 2011/8/31 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]>
>>
>>> Sebastian,
>>> I agree, breaking things is not good.
>>>
>>> Still I was able to run OpenLaszlo debugger after my changes. I recall
>>> there were issues with it, it required some non-trivial hack (namely,
>>> debugger worked only for swfs embedded into HTML).
>>>
>>> Which particular instruction is incorrect now? I will fix it (or ask the
>>> guys to fix).
>>>
>>> --
>>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>>> http://dataved.ru/
>>> +7 916 562 8095
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 9:52 PM, [email protected] <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Alexei,
>>>>
>>>> we should agree on what we do with the semi migration from the
>>>> openlaszlo server to the newest version.
>>>> At the moment deploying and for debugging the code in eclipse is
>>>> impossible.
>>>>
>>>> I think merging the red5 classes in the project also makes the code less
>>>> maintainable, but you can at least set break points and debug the code that
>>>> way just like other Eclipse/Web-Projects.
>>>>
>>>> At the moment the instructions on the Website are just wrong, somehow it
>>>> shows to download the code but the hole deployment is wrong.
>>>> I would hardly agree on just deleting all those things again... but
>>>> somehow the hole project is not really maintainable at the moment. We 
>>>> really
>>>> need to tidy up all those unreferenced and duplicated JARs and files.
>>>>
>>>> But first we should agreed on the general setup.
>>>> How can we make sure that when we fix the openlaszlo/red5 stuff this
>>>> time, we do not end up in adding another time 50MB of JARs and stuff.
>>>>
>>>> Sebastian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>



-- 
Sebastian Wagner
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
[email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OpenMeetings developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to