@George: I did not notice that yet, if so then you're right. The choose device UI should be always top level UI element.
Sebastian 2012/5/11 George Kirkham <[email protected]> > OpenMeetings 2.0 build xx is to my knowledge the code being updated. So to > answer your question, “yes, 2.0”.**** > > ** ** > > How often do you update your OpenMeetings server, and would you have both > a prod and a test server? Can be handy to do so. **** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > ** ** > > George Kirkham**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > *On Behalf Of *Daniel Ascher > *Sent:* Friday, 11 May 2012 9:57 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Request for improvement**** > > ** ** > > Is this only in OM 2.0, because I don't see this in the prior version? > > Dan**** > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:37 PM, George Kirkham <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > Sebastian,**** > > **** > > I have noticed that when a person joins a room, any video windows from > other users who are already in the room load up over the top of their > “Choose Devices” Window. This makes it difficult for them to select > settings (until they move all of the video Windows out of the way). It > would be much better if the “Choose Devices” Window could be the top most > (i.e. above/on top the Video Windows).**** > > **** > > Users who are not intimately familiar with OpenMeetings get confused > because they don’t see the “Choose Devices” dialog.**** > > **** > > Thanks,**** > > **** > > George Kirkham**** > > **** > > IT Manager**** > > Cooperative Research Centre For Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC) **** > > NFF House, 14 - 16 Brisbane Avenue, Barton, ACT, 2600, Australia**** > > T: (02) 6120 1600**** > > F: (02) 6273 7181**** > > E: [email protected], **** > > W: www.co2crc.com.au**** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* George Kirkham [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, 11 May 2012 7:31 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* But if there is anything I can do to further this effort, > please let me know!**** > > **** > > Dan, Sergey, Stephen, (and to myself),**** > > **** > > Do you have an environment where you can test the stability/reliability of > OpenMeetings. For example where several or more people can use > OpenMeetings and report on any issues, and the try to repeat the same issue > on another day.**** > > **** > > A clear, methodical approach to observing, and then identifying how to > repeat issues really help developers. It is even better if you can match > the issue with entries in the log files.**** > > **** > > While my OpenMeetings installation has been very good most of the time, > there are instances where some of my “test” users in conference rooms have > become unstable, but so far I have not had the time to be able to repeat > the issue frequently enough to identify why (or to match the problem > occurrences with an entries in the red5/log/*.log). These issues have not > been too serious, closing the browser and logging back in to the room fixes > most, on a few occasions I have had to reboot my PC. I have also observed > more issues when the PC is wirelessly connect (wireless LAN), which could > be related to my Wireless router.**** > > **** > > My hope is that if there is enough of us “users of OpenMeetings”, we can > identify issues, check with each other to see if the others can also create > the same issue, thus confirm the problem is not just with our own > environment, and be able to report an issue in a way that the developers > can more easily identify and fix. I am sure that they have limited time to > which the can contribute to OpenMeetings so if we can identify repeatable > issues and rule out any personal environmental problems, it should help in > reducing the reporting of problems which are not due to OpenMeetings itself. > **** > > **** > > So my request for Dan, Sergey, Stephen and others is, “when I report an > issue or a suggestion, please, when you have time, check my statements in > your own OpenMeetings environements and see if what I say is correct or a > worthwhile suggestion and then report back. Especially if I make a > suggestion for an improvement for something that I would like but it does > not make sense to you, or even better, you see an even more effective way > the improvement can be implemented (e.g. let’s do some brain storming). > Sometimes the most simplest of ideas are the greatest. For example, “one > tool that OpenMeetings whiteboad does not currently have is a highlighter, > like the highlighter pens”. **** > > **** > > **** > > Thanks,**** > > **** > > George Kirkham**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > *On Behalf Of *Daniel Ascher > *Sent:* Friday, 11 May 2012 2:29 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: exclusive audio in Build #68**** > > **** > > I would like to thank everyone who is working so hard on this project. I > am not an engineer so I can't contribute any coding. But if there is > anything I can do to further this effort, please let me know! > > Dan Ascher**** > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > I'm really happy seeing new faces (George, Sergey, Stephen) around > with thoughtful and skillful posts - Openmeetings needs you, guys, for a > strong community. The strong community is mandatory for us to leave > incubation and become an full-scale Apache project.**** > > **** > > Thank you.**** > > > > > -- > Daniel Ascher, M.Ed. > President > A+ Test Prep and Tutoring > "Creating Bright Futures" > > 505 York Road, Suite 6 > Jenkintown, PA 19046 > Office: 215.886.9188 > Direct: 267.242.9640 > www.aplustutoring.com**** > -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock http://www.openmeetings.de http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com [email protected]
