On 3/30/07, Perry E. Metzger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Kannaiyan Natesan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'd also say that something like a SIP softphone is probably what you >> want. or even less than that: emulate a headset via bluetooth, i.e. >> have the neo act as a headset device for your PC based softphone >> application. > > Asterisk is a PBX. Now we can PBX in hand to handle the calls > smoothly in whatever the way we want. There is no point in having a PBX in the end device. You aren't going to switch 20 calls through your handset simultaneously and you don't have enough bandwidth to do it even if you're silly enough to desire it. The phone also isn't going to be on all the time, or on the network at all times.
I mentioned PBX there just to say to use the functionalities that we can use from asterisk. Had a chance to look into its capabilities? I'm using it only for my single phoneline at home for 5 years. I don't have 24 lines with T1 capability.
> You want to record during the conversation and playback later? If you want that, use a software PBX server in a closet on a proper UPS with a stable connection to the PSTN and/or Internet. There is no point to PBX functionality on the *phone*. If you want to record the conversation, you can do it on a box with plenty of CPU, disk, etc., not on the phone.
If openmoko can do that, Why should I buy the rest?. If openmoko is not capable of sending email or remote storage through samba, nfs etc., through the wifi then it is useless to buy that device. If the openmoko is currently uses 100% CPU for rest of its operations, how come you can ask a opensource enthusiast to play around with that device? Is it not looking like cheating business here ? Kannaiyan
-- Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
