On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:43:12AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > Openmoko patch series has some "easy to merge" patches to it. Would it > be okay if I just took them, cleaned them up a little bit, and send > upstream? That way, we can make the diff between upstream and openmoko > smaller...
Mh, Ben Dooks was working on integrating of those patches to some degree, so we should coordinate on this. > Prime candidate would be gta01-backlight patch. #ifdef killing is easy > enough to do, and should allow upstream merge. When all the > gta01-... are merged, gta01-core can be sent to rmk... First of all, Ben is still waiting for a reply from rmk on whether GTA01 can be renamed to 'neo1973'. This rename would affect all patches, so this needs to be first. Secondly, the gta01bl should be generalized in a s3c2410bl, which receives a platform_data structure on which timer to use. This way it can be used by all s3c2410 boards that use the internal PWM unit to control a backlight. So, generally, I would prefer to 1) receive and integrate cleanup patches to our tree 2) have ben/you/other developers ask if I am fine with the current state of a driver before submitting it mainline. Apart from that, I'm all for merging mainline. Thansk for your interest in helping out :) -- - Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://openmoko.org/ ============================================================================ Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone
