On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:35:30PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > > Prime candidate would be gta01-backlight patch. #ifdef killing is easy > > > > > enough to do, and should allow upstream merge. When all the > > > > > gta01-... are merged, gta01-core can be sent to rmk... > > > > > > > > First of all, Ben is still waiting for a reply from rmk on whether GTA01 > > > > can be renamed to 'neo1973'. This rename would affect all patches, so > > > > this needs to be first. > > > > > > Hmm, I think it is entirely upon us how we want our machine to be > > > named. > > > > But GTA01 is already a registered name for the machine type at the arm > > machine registry. That name predates neo1973 > > > > Actually I'd preger 'neo' -- we don't really want all those numbers > > > and neo1974 is a bit unlikely, right? > > > > neo1978 however is. 'neo' is way too unspecific and will apply to many > > products on the roadmap. > > Hmm, if neo1978 follows after neo1973... I guess gta01/gta02 are > better names after all. They are shorter, and _way_ easier to > remember.
no, it's different. Both GTA01 and GTA02 are Neo1973 ;0 Sorry. Believe me, we are thinking hard about this, and it is being taken care of. rm has been asked to rename MACH_GTA01 to MACH_NEO1973_GTA01 and MACH_NEO1973_GTA02, which is the only logical, precise and conclusive way for naming. The same naming scheme will be followed further down the road. -- - Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://openmoko.org/ ============================================================================ Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone
