Nils Faerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
>>> I tried several times, both on V3 and V4. >>> After I removed the command again everything returned to normal, device >>> boots. >>> What side effect could >>> s3c2410_gpio_cfgpin(GTA01_IRQ_MODEM, S3C2410_GPF1_EINT1); >>> possibly have concerning the NAND Flash? >> >> too bad. My fault. sorry :( > > Really no problem! > I rather try broken stuff than nothing at all. So also wrong tries are > greatly appreciated! And besides... also failures serve a purpose: You > learn how not to do it ;) > >> This should have been: >> s3c2410_gpio_cfgpin(S3C2410_GPF1, S3C2410_GPF1_EINT1); > > OK, here we go: It does not "crash" anymore but it also does not help > either. :( > > The interesting thing is that supposedly also during run-time the > interrupt handler should at least printk() that the wake-up int has > occurred, which should assumingly happen when calling the NEO. That's what I was thinking too. > But even at run-time exactly nothing happens. > > That leads to two assumptions: > 1. The modem still needs to be configured to assert the modem wakeup > signal - How? > 2. The wakeup irq GPIO is still wired incorrectly? > > I think at this point we need help from someone who knows more about the > modem or the wiring... yeah, even if imho someone who knows the modem would be more valuable :) Arnaud
