Richard Purdie wrote: > On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 12:39 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: >> Javi Roman wrote: >> > Please let me know what's wrong, or some other kind of feedback. >> >> > BTW, I wonder if it's better to create a new class driver for vibrator >> > rather than led class. >> >> Why? That would be a 100% duplicate, since the feature-set is entirely >> the same. I'd rather rename the "LED class" "Indicator class" if >> people have problems with the slightly misleading name.
> I'm ok with the vibrator being part of the LED class but I would prefer > to keep the existing name since changing it would break the API now. I > don't think duplicating the code makes much sense. That's what I hoped for from the LED class maintainer -- thanks. (The proposed name change wasn't meant very serious anyways). Regards, :M: -- Michael 'Mickey' Lauer | IT-Freelancer | http://www.vanille-media.de
