On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 12:39 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Javi Roman wrote: > > Please let me know what's wrong, or some other kind of feedback. > > > BTW, I wonder if it's better to create a new class driver for vibrator > > rather than led class. > > Why? That would be a 100% duplicate, since the feature-set is entirely > the same. I'd rather rename the "LED class" "Indicator class" if > people have problems with the slightly misleading name.
I'm ok with the vibrator being part of the LED class but I would prefer to keep the existing name since changing it would break the API now. I don't think duplicating the code makes much sense. Regards, Richard
