Andy Green wrote: > So the status of 2.6.24-random-upstream-git for our usage is looking > pretty decent right now.
That's wonderful news, thanks ! So I'll keep the new features I've recently merged into our 2.6.22 tree in separate patches, to make it easier to spot what needs applying to 2.6.24 once we switch. Do you have any things that you'd want to get done before we switch, or is it basically "as soon as the rest of us is ready" for you ? > The JFFS2 mount time was about the same. JFFS2 looks at ever block of the file system for data. So mount time is O(partition size), not O(data in use) :-( > Clearly we burn a lot of time scrolling that framebuffer at the moment. Ah, doing GPU-local copies may be an interesting area for improvements then. By the way, Dodji reported that we got a bit of a performance boost for Xglamo "for free" (*) yesterday, by letting it have some more memory (now 4MB, instead of 640*480*2), so that it can store off-screen pixmaps in the frame buffer. (*) This came as a side-effect of cleaning up allocations for RandR. - Werner
