Andy Green wrote: > Nope you weren't clear :-) So my change to that file is fine all around.
Yup, it is. Sorry for the confusion. I've moved the complaint now to its rightful place. > linux-wireless will get it first, and believe me they can be tough > cookies because they don't want to get blamed for handing crap to their > upstream. That's the spirit ! :-) > Huh... obvious. Thanks ! Applied in revision 4009. By the way, the FIQ changes are actually an excellent example for why it's hard to disambiguate which files a patch touches: the two files this patch touches are in all three introduce-fiq-*.patch files, and they're even all affected by this patch, because their context overlaps. Pretty close to the worst-case scenario. I ended up just editing the .patch files directly :-) - Werner
