On Sunday 01 June 2008 01:53:45 Carsten Haitzler wrote: > but in the end what we REALLY want is zero-clock. no suspend. we want to be > able to wake up from zero clock and handle and interrupt within 100-200ms > or so. this way being in suspend or not is never going to be the issue. the > issue is simply deciding how long after going idle we go into zero clock - > and what other separate power saving schemes do we use (screenblanking is > another, turning off the touchscreen interrupt when going into "deep sleep" > after a period of being idle, letting apps know to slow down or stop their > polling if they do such a thing when in "deep sleep", and knowing when to > turn interrupts back on on the touchscreen (ie go from deep sleep into high > power mode again when an incoming call comes in or sms and you want the > screen to come on, and a user possibly to interact with it etc.).
Yes. :M:
