Andy,
from a driver perspective, do you like our accelerometer chips? (ST
LIS302DL)
Are you aware of other accelerometer chips with better Linux mainline
support, or generally better?
Wolfgang
On Aug 26, 2008, at 11:57 PM, Andy Green wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| It seems like the accelerometers have the following:
|
| sensitive to losing an edge trigger
We just suspect it, nobody showed it yet... it would probably be a bug
in the driver handling or s3c stuff rather than accelerometer
"feature".
| occur at a periodic rate
| access conflicts with other drivers so should be done outside of irq
I have a nice patch coming that just does it bitbang the whole way
using
IRQs off as locking throughout.
| Does it make sense to just turn off the irq and have the driver
use a
| delayed work queue to poll at a given rate?
Interrupts are at least somewhat synchronized to the source, I think
it
will suffer from dropped samples otherwise. But, at some point we
have
to take more radical measures if we don't solve it...
- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAki0J/cACgkQOjLpvpq7dMqi5QCeLfmGtEa7fsKOsvJxuWKSD3k8
lJAAn07iXJaI+syIEqrBGold9CKeA+wm
=9h5o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
