Hi, 2008/8/30 Joerg Reisenweber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Am Fr 29. August 2008 schrieb Andy Green: >> I don't know anything about advantage of having two, > > The original idea of having 2 g-meters probably was to detect rotation. Alas > it turns out they aren't sensible and exact enough to do this trick for > anything other than quick rotation shaking motion out of your forearm
Is this based on experiments? I briefly looked on the web for any analyses/results but didn't find any and didn't have much time to investigate myself. The high frequency of the measurements seems improve the precision a bit. Cheers
