Mike (mwester) wrote: > You are unilaterally making the decision to replace existing > functionality with something that provides considerably lesser > functionality, yet you have never proven the case that the lost > functionality is, in fact, extraneous.
Heh, they say "it's impossible to prove a negative" :-) But do you have an example for a real-life accident where you've successfully used the in-kernel power down mechanism and you think the experience would have been significantly worse if only neodog would have been available ? - Werner
