Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > ...if someone writes a battery class driver for GTA01.
So if we remove the APM code from the the driver destined for upstream, then there will be the following possibilities: - we get a battery class driver done for GTA01 in time to submit along with the PCF50633 changes, so everything comes back at the same time from upstream, - we get that battery class driver for GTA01 done by the time the PCF50633 changes come back, so it would be an OM-local patch until the next iteration, or - if all else fails, we can just put the APM emulation calls back as an OM-local patch when the PCF50633 changes come back, and remove them when we're ready to use the battery class for everything. Does this sound good ? My hunch is that we'll probably end up with the middle choice, which doesn't seem too bad. - Werner
