Am Donnerstag, den 02.10.2008, 09:25 -0300 schrieb Werner Almesberger: > Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > > ...if someone writes a battery class driver for GTA01. > > So if we remove the APM code from the the driver destined for upstream, > then there will be the following possibilities: > > - we get a battery class driver done for GTA01 in time to submit along > with the PCF50633 changes, so everything comes back at the same time > from upstream, > > - we get that battery class driver for GTA01 done by the time the > PCF50633 changes come back, so it would be an OM-local patch until > the next iteration, or > > - if all else fails, we can just put the APM emulation calls back as > an OM-local patch when the PCF50633 changes come back, and remove > them when we're ready to use the battery class for everything. > > Does this sound good ? My hunch is that we'll probably end up with the > middle choice, which doesn't seem too bad.
Sounds pretty good to me. :M:
