Andy Green wrote: > It seems some other folks are interested to take care about making sure > we are clean for config variations, I'll leave this to them.
Sounds like a good plan. Since Nelson should soon become the one who will find config conflicts long before anyone else would, I think it would be good if he could assume the role of "config czar" for a while, and not only report but also try to fix those conflicts. That should also make his work a bit more entertaining :-) Long-term, I would expect that as soon as the random config checker works well, it will pretty quickly find all the config bugs we have, and thus eliminate most of its work. Since we'll still introduce new issues from time to time, this would then become something for our QA department to take care of, so ownership of that testing utility would then get transferred to them, and the temporary role of the "config czar" wouldn't be needed anymore. Nelson, does that plan sound good to you ? - Werner
