-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Werner Almesberger wrote: > Andy Green wrote: >> It seems some other folks are interested to take care about making sure >> we are clean for config variations, I'll leave this to them. > > Sounds like a good plan. Since Nelson should soon become the one who > will find config conflicts long before anyone else would, I think it
Being reasonably config-clean is important, but it's basically the number of possible config combinations is immense and sitting there studying them all doesn't really move us or Nelson on. Only a small subset of the combinations are actually realistic, I think Nelson's plan of having a whitelist of configs is probably the most workable. It also has the advantage that he can set it up and move on to more interesting (for him and us) things, we can just tack configs on the list as we find new reasonable cases for them. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjvAzEACgkQOjLpvpq7dMpLugCfQ3vnnquifbx/mfaLd5ci7Pdt PmIAn2pNTb5Wijc+n+162gNpSLiFp5nx =tGmh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
