-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote: |>> I don't know if that's part of what he has to get straight for pcf50606 |>> to be meaningful, but I am sure the quality and reliability of any |>> figures it will give are going to be continue to be poor compared to |>> GTA02 with HDQ smart battery where you can pretty much believe the |>> capacity number completely, there's not a huge amount to be done about it. |> Sure, we can't expect things the hardware does not offer. Getting what it offers |> through th same interface as on GTA02 is fine for us. | | OK, pcf50633 does not offer a sysfs for battery voltage. But I think it | can't be done away with for PCF50606..
Can we not make "battery" power_supply device and do it down there? I think that's what's actually being looked for. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklrYuQACgkQOjLpvpq7dMorFwCfeW+d8H6aAL9JEgbclUuW+jyc ez8An1KYSRum/JH0CvtuFNT2NkFqeH11 =f8zH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
