-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 03:33:56PM +0000, Andy Green wrote: |> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |> Hash: SHA1 |> |> Somebody in the thread at some point said: |> | On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote: |> |>> I don't know if that's part of what he has to get straight for pcf50606 |> |>> to be meaningful, but I am sure the quality and reliability of any |> |>> figures it will give are going to be continue to be poor compared to |> |>> GTA02 with HDQ smart battery where you can pretty much believe the |> |>> capacity number completely, there's not a huge amount to be done |> about it. |> |> Sure, we can't expect things the hardware does not offer. Getting |> what it offers |> |> through th same interface as on GTA02 is fine for us. |> | |> | OK, pcf50633 does not offer a sysfs for battery voltage. But I think it |> | can't be done away with for PCF50606.. |> |> Can we not make "battery" power_supply device and do it down there? I |> think that's what's actually being looked for. |> | | Yes, that should be possible through platform data :) We can have a | simple battery-class driver just to wrap stuff.. Will do that soon.
Great. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklrabAACgkQOjLpvpq7dMpMQwCfcw58sXzCPWjmyEgUV5+s3iLV YVAAniq33yEPbT4Zf4dJcixv+lr32kRs =A+Vk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
