-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | Andy Green wrote: |> Who actually read the code and determined that, and what is the story |> about how it handles RTS and CTS? | | See my previous mail on the topic. I didn't see anything suspicious | about RTS/CTS but the IN1 logic has a simplistic implementation that | leads to complex semantics.
Yeah I read the thread backwards. So there's nothing to worry about with this "multi character" claim. | I don't think this causes any of the troubles people are concerned | about at the moment and any non-trivial change there would need a | lot of testing, so I'd put it into the "fix later" pile. Fine. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmQeYQACgkQOjLpvpq7dMpMDACeMIw5nGILomSQ7hjwdhroQE23 DIQAmwWRH4AyfuHm3R3kS4QYrcD5TVNH =ZrAD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
