On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> Do you plan to contribute special feature generation for the sentence
> detector and tokenizer for Portuguese?
>
>
I don't think I need a custom feature generator for Portuguese if I can use
the current dictionary implementation. But I have to change the EOS
characters.

In my project I'll have to use my own dictionary implementation. I don't
like the OpenNLP default one because it takes longer to load. I use a LGPL
library that creates really small binary dictionaries that doesn't need to
be parse during initialization.


> Jörn
>

William


>
> On 7/6/11 3:28 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm reviewing component by component while creating new Portuguese models.
>> I
>> created an initial version of the models using default configuration: no
>> specific features or dictionaries. It was easy to do with the trunk code.
>> Latter I'll report about the accuracy, precision and recall of the models.
>> Now I will try to improve it by adding dictionaries and specific features.
>> Sometimes I'll have to change the code for that. For example to pass
>> factory
>> to load that loads the dictionaries and features. I really like that the
>> models can hold configurations now and it is much simpler to load it
>> during
>> runtime and evaluation.
>>
>> Should this be reported?
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Jörn Kottmann<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>  Hi all,
>>>
>>> one month already passed again and it is time for our next board report,
>>> I added the project description and the goals from the June report,
>>> please
>>> feel free to come up with suggestion about what we should report.
>>>
>>> Jörn
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/1/11 4:00 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>  Dear OpenNLP Developers,
>>>>
>>>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
>>>> Incubator PMC.
>>>> It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your
>>>> quarterly
>>>> board report.
>>>>
>>>> The board meeting is scheduled for  Wed, 20 July 2011, 10 am Pacific.
>>>> The
>>>> report
>>>> for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The
>>>> Incubator PMC
>>>> requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting,
>>>> to
>>>> allow
>>>> sufficient time for review.
>>>>
>>>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator
>>>> PMC,
>>>> and
>>>> subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest
>>>> you
>>>> should submit your report is one week prior to the board meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> The Apache Incubator PMC
>>>>
>>>> Submitting your Report
>>>> ----------------------
>>>>
>>>> Your report should contain the following:
>>>>
>>>>  * Your project name
>>>>  * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
>>>> the
>>>> project
>>>>    or necessarily of its field
>>>>  * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
>>>> towards
>>>>    graduation.
>>>>  * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
>>>> aware of
>>>>  * How has the community developed since the last report
>>>>  * How has the project developed since the last report.
>>>>
>>>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/****incubator/July2011<http://wiki.apache.org/**incubator/July2011>
>>>> <http://**wiki.apache.org/incubator/**July2011<http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2011>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this
>>>> page is
>>>>       created from a template.
>>>>
>>>> Mentors
>>>> -------
>>>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
>>>> the
>>>> Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following
>>>> the
>>>> project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the
>>>> Incubator
>>>> PMC.
>>>>
>>>> Incubator PMC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to