Hi all,

I have just committed the improvement for OPENNLP-402, which should make it
much easier to understand the class structure of the cmdline package.
Naming, javadocs, and the class hierarchy is improved.

Can you take a look at the comment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-402?focusedCommentId=13190767#comment-13190767
and
the diagram:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12511441/opennlp-cmdline-package-class-structure.png
and
let me know whether it is clearer now? Thank you!

William, I would appreciate if you give it a look, since you asked above.

Aliaksandr

On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 7:24 PM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you, Aliaksandr,
>
> I really like how we can use stream factories during training and
> evaluating tools. The changes you did are great.
> I don't know if we need to improve the documentation. The code looks
> good. Now I understand it better with your commit to fix this issue.
>
> Thanks
> William
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Aliaksandr Autayeu
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi William!
> >
> > Thank you for pointing this out. I have fixed it. Can you check and close
> > the issue?
> >
> > How can I improve the documentation (or the code itself) so that the new
> > code is easier to understand? Any advice?
> >
> > Aliaksandr
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 2:57 PM, [email protected] <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Aliaksandr,
> >>
> >> Could you also check the issue
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-418 ? I tried to fix it
> >> by myself but I could not find an appropriate solution. I still have
> >> to better understand the new code.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> William
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > On 1/18/12 1:05 AM, James Kosin wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I put the TODO there; because I couldn't determine if it was a better
> >> >> place.  The only big downside to using the Stream is we have no
> control
> >> >> over the encoding.  So, I was thinking more that this method of
> loading
> >> >> the item would be deprecated anyway.  In favor of the other method.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Decoding with the correct encoding is the responsibility of the
> >> > Reader. There is no need to pass an encoding along in this method,
> right?
> >> >
> >> > Jörn
> >>
>

Reply via email to