[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13081759#comment-13081759
]
William Colen commented on OPENNLP-226:
---------------------------------------
What about the methods from Evaluator?
void missclassified(Span references[], Span predictions[], String
referenceSample, String predictedSample, String sentence)
void missclassified(Span references[], Span predictions[], String
referenceSample, String predictedSample, String[] sentenceTokens)
void missclassified(String references[], String predictions[], String
referenceSample, String predictedSample, String[] sentenceTokens)
Or do you think we should take advantage of some structure provided by
F-Measure classes? I can't see it yet.
> Evaluators should allow tools to register a misclassified report interface
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENNLP-226
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-226
> Project: OpenNLP
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Chunker, Command Line Interface, Name Finder, POS
> Tagger, Sentence Detector, Tokenizer
> Affects Versions: tools-1.5.2-incubating
> Reporter: William Colen
> Assignee: William Colen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: tools-1.5.2-incubating
>
>
> OPENNLP-220 introduced the -misclassified argument that enables evaluators to
> print misclassified items while using the command line evaluators. We should
> expand it to allow any other tool that uses evaluators to register an
> interface to get that information.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
