> On 05.07.2016, at 15:36, Alejandro Galue <aga...@opennms.org> wrote: > > >> On Jul 5, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Ronny Trommer <ro...@opennms.org >> <mailto:ro...@opennms.org>> wrote: >> >> Even if you would succeed with your plan and you get everything done as you >> imagine for your project add DevJam - you removed some pain for you on one >> place, somebody else added more pain for you on another place and you have >> added pain for the other one on your place - this work mode does not make >> sense to me :) > > > Could you please elaborate more on your idea ?
I don’t have in general no idea, but as soon we don’t get to common understanding, you are are one person refactoring code in one direction where you think this is the way to go and five others do something totally differently cause every individual person thinks this is the way to go make no sense to me. It’s not making anything better :)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape
_______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-devel mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel
