Am Mittwoch 10 November 2010, 00:05:10 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
> Am Dienstag 09 November 2010, 22:49:10 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
> > Am Dienstag 09 November 2010, 09:45:19 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
> > > Zitat von "hui li" <nami.li1...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Thans a lot for your mail. The obex15 spec says "SRM shall be used
> > > > for all multi-response operatons(PUT and GET) for the duration of
> > > > the SRM mode". I don`t know why you think SRM only valid in PUT
> > > > request and GET response in my branch. I handled both server and
> > > > client side during SRM.
> > > > 
> > > >  For SRM PUT request ,client keeps sending request containing body 
> > > >  to
> > > > 
> > > > server  without server response ,and server only responses at the
> > > > first request, the last put request or abort request. For SRM GET
> > > > request, server keeps sending responses containing body  to client
> > > > without client other request ,and client only send first SRM GET
> > > > request  or  abort request.
> > > > My  brach simply assumes only client can request SRM enble firstly,
> > > > if server receives SRM header, it responses SRM enable. On a put or
> > > > get operation, server does not request SRM in its head initiatively.
> > > > 
> > > > I will study your queue without threading later.
> > > 
> > > I will publish it (not done, yet). The idea is to make
> > > OBEX_HandleInput() not call obex_transport_handle_input() but a new
> > > function obex_work() instead which call one of the new function
> > > obex_(client|server)_work(). In those, it is easy to see in which
> > > state a response will not come and a packet has to be sent without it.
> > > Omitting more than one response(server) or additional requests(client)
> > > is easily done inline.
> > > I will post a proposal patch this evening so everybody can comment. It
> > > will leave handling of all OBEX SRM headers to the application so it
> > > can decide if it trusts the transport enough to enable it.
> > 
> > Here it is. Note that the write()/send() functions still fail too easily.
> > That's needs to be solved, I'll do that the next days.
> > 
> > What's in it:
> > - allows to handle SRM mode
> > - removes STATE_IDLE which was only used in MODE_CLI (now handled by
> > STATE_SEND)
> > - changes rx_msg buffer management so that a message stream is handled
> > correctly
> > 
> > You can test it easily with any application by initialising
> > self->rsp_mode to OBEX_RSP_MODE_SINGLE instead of OBEX_RSP_MODE_NORMAL.
> 
> Ups, a error crept in. Here is another version.

You can find it now in my repository:
http://www.gitorious.org/openobex/mainline/commits/for-mainline

I splitted it into several patches.

HS

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a 
Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your 
business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Openobex-users mailing list
Openobex-users@lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openobex-users

Reply via email to