Hello,
the function will abort because it's not implemented yet:
if (size != 4) {
LOG_DEBUG("%s %x %d %d", __func__, address, size, count);
return ERROR_COMMAND_SYNTAX_ERROR;
}
The size is 2 (for 16bit) and the read aborts. There is a missing wrapper from
aligned 32bit to
16bit or 8bit. Anyway this is not your fault its still a missing
implementation. There is a way to
write 8bit data (stlink), i think thats the way we should use to fix this.
Regards,
Mathias
On 11.01.2012 22:42, Jonathan Dumaresq wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Spencer Oliver wrote:
>> On 10 January 2012 15:11, Jonathan Dumaresq <jdumar...@cimeq.qc.ca>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Is there a way to use an stlink with swd right now with openocd ? I
>>> will use the stm32 M0 devices
>>>
>>
>> Only the stlink-v2 is supported at the moment - swd mode is used by
>> default.
>> With regards to using with M0 - not tested ST, are not great at
>> supporting Open Source projects.
>>
>
> I have a small problem. I can't use the target_xxx_u16 function. It's always
> fails.
>
> Debug: 315 2505344 command.c:151 script_debug(): command - ocd_command
> ocd_command type ocd_mdh 0x0 1
> Debug: 316 2505391 command.c:151 script_debug(): command - mdh ocd_mdh 0x0 1
> Debug: 318 2505422 stm32_stlink.c:571 stm32_stlink_read_memory():
> stm32_stlink_read_memory 0 2 1
> Debug: 319 2505437 command.c:151 script_debug(): command - ocd_command
> ocd_command type ocd_usage mdh
> Debug: 320 2505469 command.c:151 script_debug(): command - usage ocd_usage
> mdh
> User : 322 2505484 command.c:901 command_help_show(): mdhUser : 323 2505484
> command.c:908 command_help_show(): User : 324 2505500 command.c:880
> command_help_show_wrap(): ['phys'] address [count]
> User : 325 2505516 command.c:863 command_help_show_indent(): User : 326
> 2505531 command.c:901 command_help_show(): stm32f0x.cpu mdhUser : 327
> 2505547 command.c:908 command_help_show(): User : 328 2
> 505562 command.c:880 command_help_show_wrap(): address [count]
> User : 329 2505562 command.c:695 command_run_line(): in procedure 'mdh'
>
>
> And for the write I got the same thing.
>
> If I try the u32, everything works
> Any idea ?
>
> Regards
>
> Jonathan
>
>> Cheers
>> Spen
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
> infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
> virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
> desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
> costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
> _______________________________________________
> OpenOCD-devel mailing list
> OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
