On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Øyvind Harboe <[email protected]> wrote: >> Anyway, I did not ask for buy-in. I asked if someone was strongly >> against replacing Tcl. Not many, if any, were. I think this is good! :) > > I am strongly against replacing Jim Tcl. I don't think a very > convincing case has been made that there are enough(if any) convincing > advantages that would offset the risk and pain.
Maybe its good time for Peter to simply start new fork on repo.or.cz and show it would look and how much work will this change require..? Does LUA provide function calls and all operations that Jim TCL does? If so, and the change is good, why not? If this is only a matter of writing variables into configuration files and there are missing functionalities the workload is too big for the given effect..? :-) Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
