On 28 February 2012 06:46, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't believe that there is much, if any, programming at all that >> 95% of use cases involves and therefore there would not be much >> advantage to a better language(I'm not saying Lua is). > > It's not about use, it's about development. "I don't know Tcl" comes > up again and again. Me, I *did* know Tcl rather well, but haven't > used it for more than 15 years and I am utterly disinterested in > starting to use it again. Not so with Lua. Which translates to more > hours contributed. (Not just by me, I expect.) > >
In my original statement i was referring to the fact i am not familiar with integrating TCL-C. I can work my around tcl enough for OpenOCD usage. The other argument is how many people understand lua - probably the same as tcl. I do not have strong opinions for either jim or lua - the community will have to decide. Cheers Spen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
