Hello, On 26.02.2013 16:12, John wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:15:27PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >> Hello, >> >> still there is no review or response on the patch, wouldn't it be >> good to have support of one more target in OpenOCD? >> >> If any problems are found with the change, please let me know. >> >> With best wishes, Vladimir > > Very possibly no-one else can test it. >
I want to believe it is not true and maintainers are simply busy, otherwise in my humble opinion it might be a decline of the open source project, which deals with hardware. If hardware specific changes are not accepted only because they can't be tested due to absence of particular hardware, it leads to duplicated work and wasted time of independent developers, fortunately other big open source projects like U-boot and Linux don't follow such a suspicious policy decision. I presume there wasn't available hardware for a couple of my previous patches to OpenOCD before accepting them by maintainers, and hopefully someone (not counting me) gained from their integration anyway. -- With best wishes, Vladimir ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
