On 6 March 2013 08:52, Vladimir Zapolskiy <v...@mleia.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On 26.02.2013 16:12, John wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:15:27PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> still there is no review or response on the patch, wouldn't it be >>> good to have support of one more target in OpenOCD? >>> >>> If any problems are found with the change, please let me know. >>> >>> With best wishes, Vladimir >> >> Very possibly no-one else can test it. >> > > I want to believe it is not true and maintainers are simply busy, otherwise > in my humble opinion it might be a decline of the open source project, which > deals with hardware. If hardware specific changes are not accepted only > because they can't be tested due to absence of particular hardware, it leads > to duplicated work and wasted time of independent developers, fortunately > other big open source projects like U-boot and Linux don't follow such a > suspicious policy decision. > > I presume there wasn't available hardware for a couple of my previous > patches to OpenOCD before accepting them by maintainers, and hopefully > someone (not counting me) gained from their integration anyway. >
It may be true that the maintainers do not have access to hardware, but this does not mean the patch is ignored - it is on gerrit so is on the todo list. Cheers Spen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
