Hi, Please do not think I was going to start a language war, of course everyone's free to make his own choices. And you're absolutely right it is much easier to get some C language module included in a project that's written in C itself.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 01:40:12PM -0400, Evan Foss wrote: > I was going to write a library in C and add a little bit of code to > OpenOCD to connect to it. [snip] > then I would move on to connecting to a CAD tool. I can imagine such a smart schematics capture tool that would load a BSDL file, parse it and provide realtime feedback and control over device's pins by talking to OpenOCD via its RPC interface. And it's already possible to implement without any changes to OpenOCD if one agrees to control only one device in a chain at any given time. And this limitation can be removed with relatively minor modifications. -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:[email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
