On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Pete Batard <[email protected]> wrote:
> By the way, is there an option to specify libftdi 1.0 over 0.x? Right
> now I'm replacing the -lftdi with -lftdi1 in configure.ac & Makefile.am,
> but I'm wondering if I'm missing something in terms of conf.
>

Yes it is good to migrate from libftdi-0.x to libftdi-1.0 if
it is available in the system or the user specify it.

However, in this case, you are using the new libusb-1.0 API
based ftdi jtag driver (interface/ftdi/olimex-jtag-tiny.cfg), it
does not use libftdi at all, rather it directly use libusb-1.0
API. So you can just build OpenOCD with --enable-ftdi
and skip --enable-ft2232_libftdi, then you will not need
to care about libftdi-0.x or libftdi-1.0 at all.

Ref: the new ftdi driver uses libusb-1.0 sync/async API
http://repo.or.cz/w/openocd.git/blob/HEAD:/src/jtag/drivers/ftdi.c
http://repo.or.cz/w/openocd.git/blob/HEAD:/src/jtag/drivers/mpsse.c

-- 
Xiaofan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel

Reply via email to