On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Paul Sokolovsky <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:55:53 +0400
> Paul Fertser <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Michael Schwingen wrote:
> > > I wonder if one of the existing HLA protocols might be useable.
> >
> > They're even higher level, about the Gdb serial protocol, so no,
> > unlikely.
> >
> > > abstraction that it can be used on STM32, ATMega etc.. with
> > > different
> >
> > Who would use ATMega if it costs _more_ than modern controllers but
> > allows to do much, much _less_?
>
> Probably those who have paid for it already. Also those, who keep using
> awfully expensive FT232* stuff...
>
>
I don't get what you mean with "awfully expensive"... A suitable FTDI chip
is about the same price (+/- 50%) compared to a ATMega series AVR chip. And
a complete development module with a FT232H is the same price as an Arduino
Micro. And by the same reasoning, why would you bother with making a lousy
JTAG adapter out of an AVR if you already are "using awfully expensive
FT232* stuff"?

/Andreas
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel

Reply via email to