Hello, On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 21:46:59 +0200 Andreas Fritiofson <[email protected]> wrote:
[] > Ok, we can skip the FTDI-vs-MCU discussion. It's just that, for me, > FTDI based stuff is what I "have lying around" if I wanted to make my > own JTAG adapter. I don't have any Arduino boards. Most "LCB" I have > already come with embedded debug adapters. And many of those can be > reflashed as BlackMagicProbe or CMSIS-DAP interfaces if I should want > to. Sure, that just proves my point - everyone has different hardware, intersections are random. I'd like to provide a solution which works with (almost) any MCU-based device, not just those which are FTDI based or can be flashed with BlackMagicProbe or CMSIS-DAP. > > What I don't understand from your series of mails was the rationale > for creating yet another (low-performance) protocol for host-to-JTAG. > And the rationale for actually using it. Well, I started my original mail with it. I also tried to provide summary from somewhat another angle in the latest mail to Michael Schwingen. > > /Andreas -- Best regards, Paul mailto:[email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
