Rick Altherr wrote: > It's been a while since any talk about 1.0 has flown by on the list. > My take on recent developments is that calling what we have today 1.0 > is a bit of a stretch. The ToT codebase works on in a few > interface/target combinations, but there are still lots of mysterious > errors. My investigations into how to add Cortex-A8 support has led > down a few thought experiments that would cause major changes to both > the code base and to the configuration syntax. All of these things > don't make the current ToT feel like a 1.0. Since the main intent of > a versioned release is to provide an easy way for users to obtain and > build a known version, we don't really need to have an extremely solid > first release. I'd suggest that we clean up the current ToT and > release a 0.1. That way, the various package maintainers can use a > known version and hopefully users will focus on using 0.1 instead of > battling with the current ToT and the bugs it has had introduced. I think it feels more like at least 0.5, or even 0.9 - depending on target. However, it is just a number, for me, any will do fine as long as we *do* a release.
cu Michael _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
