Øyvind Harboe wrote: > OpenOCD can *NEVER* be "1.0" in that there will always be a non-trivial > effort required on the developers side to get things working. > That depends a bit on the feature set that is required for a 1.0 release. If we select platforms that are completely supported (say, ARM7 and XScale?), and get the configuration management to a state where the user only needs to tweak a supplied config file a bit for his board, I think this could be called 1.0 - a 1.0 release does not need to support every device in the world. I think it is just a matter of taste where we draw the line of what needs to be stable for a release.
However, having a stable config file syntax that does not change shortly after 1.0 would be good for users. > I'd say that 0.9 is as finished as a hardware debugger will ever be if > it is to be anything like remotely current w.r.t. hardware out there. > > So, I vote for 0.7 :-) > Fine with me. Now if the development speed stays the same, I do think we should be able to reach something that can be called 1.0 during this year. cu Michael _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
