Thank you for the log. Is "SDR 32 TDI (00000000) SMASK (FFFFFFFF) TDO (F9604093) MASK (0FFFFFFF)" at line 20 in the svf file? According to the log, it fails to verify tdo data at line 20 in the svf file.
I find a BUG when printing error message when bit_len of IR/DR is >= 32. Apply the attached patch, and svf_check_tdo will print the right information. 2009-04-02 Best Regards, Simon Qian SimonQian([email protected]) ---- www.SimonQian.com 发件人： Johann F. 发送时间： 2009-04-02 01:15:11 收件人： SimonQian 抄送： openocd-development 主题： Re: [Openocd-development] xsvf patch On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 00:43:52 +0800 "SimonQian" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > openocd - svf - failed, > > urjtag (ppdev) - svf - ok, > Can you provide the log with -d3 when doing SVF? > Hi, you find enclosed 2 diffirent logs, one with -d3 and one without, i think there are some timings problem .? Johann
svf.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
