My previous patch only fix the BUG that error message display the wrong information. Yes, data should be compared bit by bit, not byte by byte. And buf_cmp_mask can be called to do the comparation. I'll provide a patch for this.
PS: > P.S. It isn't really easy to read source code if it has long lines (> > 80). Yes, actually I noticed this problem, and in my afterwards software code length should be <= 80. 2009-04-02 Best Regards, Simon Qian SimonQian([email protected]) ---- www.SimonQian.com 发件人： Johann F. 发送时间： 2009-04-02 15:46:28 收件人： SimonQian 抄送： openocd-development 主题： Re: [Openocd-development] xsvf patch On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 02:49:40 +0800 "SimonQian" <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for the log. > > Is "SDR 32 TDI (00000000) SMASK (FFFFFFFF) TDO (F9604093) MASK (0FFFFFFF)" at > line 20 in the svf file? > According to the log, it fails to verify tdo data at line 20 in the svf file. > > I find a BUG when printing error message when bit_len of IR/DR is >= 32. > Apply the attached patch, and svf_check_tdo will print the right information. > I tried you patch, but it didn't work and make same error. I changed svf_check_tdo function so that it checks svf_tdi_buffer and svf_tdo_buffer bit for bit. Tested, it works. Enclosed patch and my svf file. Johann P.S. It isn't really easy to read source code if it has long lines (> 80).
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
