> I'd like to see the jtag.c changes as patch #1, ft2232 as #2, and JLink as
> #3.  I'm fine with the ft2232 being a big patch, but I don't like having the
> JTAG changes mixed with the drivers.

Is there a reason we shouldn't apply the jtag.c changes now?


-- 
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting services
http://consulting.zylin.com
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to