Re: [Openocd-development] JTAG, FT2232 and JLink

[Rick Altherr]

On May 15, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:

I'd like to see the jtag.c changes as patch #1, ft2232 as #2, and JLink as #3. I'm fine with the ft2232 being a big patch, but I don't like having the

JTAG changes mixed with the drivers.

Is there a reason we shouldn't apply the jtag.c changes now?


--
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting services
http://consulting.zylin.com

--
Rick Altherr
kc8...@kc8apf.net


 -- Unsigned

I don't believe so. They seem to be completely harmless until the driver chooses to opt-in. "He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development