Hi all,
The following RFC proposals are still on the table and need resolution:
1) library header file rework:
a) rename src/ as openocd/ (preferred)
- this will allow public #include, e.g. <openocd/jtag/jlink.h>
b) do not rename src, e.g. #include <jtag/jlink.h>
- something needs to be done; the library work is only half-complete
- i have a patch for "unit tests", based on this "external interface"
-
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04077.html
2) move board, target, and interface Jim script directories to src/tcl/
- this will move the whole directories intact, parallel to tcl/chip.
- more structure can be added, if we see fit; this is a small step.
-
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04685.html
3) move src/tcl to tcl/
- aims to cleanly separate the C and TCL code trees
-
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04699.html
4) change location of installed files:
- RPM packaging exposed filesystem standards conformance issues.
- need to resolve the list of changes to make, to do during the above.
-
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04626.html
5) commit testing tools
- one-step smoke tests! I probably need another week for this.
- all in-tree with no new dependencies (maybe a Perl module or two)
-
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04030.html
Most of these are fairly trivial for me to do, and I think most or all
are worth doing for 0.2.0. I can ensure that the transformations are
done gradually and are well-documented by their commit comments.
Further, I will update these path references in the documentation.
Either way, I want to know the community's desires in these matters.
Cheers,
Zach Welch
Corvallis, OR
P.S. There are other pending RFCS, but they do not seem 0.2.0 material.
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
