On Sunday 24 May 2009, Duane Ellis wrote: > > Really, we need to think *STRONGLY* about *NOT* creating "libopenocd" - > I believe creating "libopenocd" will be a nightmare (ie: the > implementation details in concrete) > > I believe that a public *SOCKET* interface with a *TEXT* based protocol > to OpenOCD is a *FAR*BETTER* choice. > Things are already in place for exactly this. > > http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/openocd/trunk/doc/manual/server.txt?rev=1910&sc=1
I caught myself wondering about that too. The "TCL Socket" ought to suffice. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
